| .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 | |
| DeviceTree Booting | |
| ------------------ | |
| During the development of the Linux/ppc64 kernel, and more specifically, the | |
| addition of new platform types outside of the old IBM pSeries/iSeries pair, it | |
| was decided to enforce some strict rules regarding the kernel entry and | |
| bootloader <-> kernel interfaces, in order to avoid the degeneration that had | |
| become the ppc32 kernel entry point and the way a new platform should be added | |
| to the kernel. The legacy iSeries platform breaks those rules as it predates | |
| this scheme, but no new board support will be accepted in the main tree that | |
| doesn't follow them properly. In addition, since the advent of the arch/powerpc | |
| merged architecture for ppc32 and ppc64, new 32-bit platforms and 32-bit | |
| platforms which move into arch/powerpc will be required to use these rules as | |
| well. | |
| The main requirement that will be defined in more detail below is the presence | |
| of a device-tree whose format is defined after Open Firmware specification. | |
| However, in order to make life easier to embedded board vendors, the kernel | |
| doesn't require the device-tree to represent every device in the system and only | |
| requires some nodes and properties to be present. For example, the kernel does | |
| not require you to create a node for every PCI device in the system. It is a | |
| requirement to have a node for PCI host bridges in order to provide interrupt | |
| routing information and memory/IO ranges, among others. It is also recommended | |
| to define nodes for on chip devices and other buses that don't specifically fit | |
| in an existing OF specification. This creates a great flexibility in the way the | |
| kernel can then probe those and match drivers to device, without having to hard | |
| code all sorts of tables. It also makes it more flexible for board vendors to do | |
| minor hardware upgrades without significantly impacting the kernel code or | |
| cluttering it with special cases. | |
| Entry point | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
| There is one single entry point to the kernel, at the start | |
| of the kernel image. That entry point supports two calling | |
| conventions: | |
| a) Boot from Open Firmware. If your firmware is compatible | |
| with Open Firmware (IEEE 1275) or provides an OF compatible | |
| client interface API (support for "interpret" callback of | |
| forth words isn't required), you can enter the kernel with: | |
| r5 : OF callback pointer as defined by IEEE 1275 | |
| bindings to powerpc. Only the 32-bit client interface | |
| is currently supported | |
| r3, r4 : address & length of an initrd if any or 0 | |
| The MMU is either on or off; the kernel will run the | |
| trampoline located in arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c to | |
| extract the device-tree and other information from open | |
| firmware and build a flattened device-tree as described | |
| in b). prom_init() will then re-enter the kernel using | |
| the second method. This trampoline code runs in the | |
| context of the firmware, which is supposed to handle all | |
| exceptions during that time. | |
| b) Direct entry with a flattened device-tree block. This entry | |
| point is called by a) after the OF trampoline and can also be | |
| called directly by a bootloader that does not support the Open | |
| Firmware client interface. It is also used by "kexec" to | |
| implement "hot" booting of a new kernel from a previous | |
| running one. This method is what I will describe in more | |
| details in this document, as method a) is simply standard Open | |
| Firmware, and thus should be implemented according to the | |
| various standard documents defining it and its binding to the | |
| PowerPC platform. The entry point definition then becomes: | |
| r3 : physical pointer to the device-tree block | |
| (defined in chapter II) in RAM | |
| r4 : physical pointer to the kernel itself. This is | |
| used by the assembly code to properly disable the MMU | |
| in case you are entering the kernel with MMU enabled | |
| and a non-1:1 mapping. | |
| r5 : NULL (as to differentiate with method a) | |
| Note about SMP entry: Either your firmware puts your other | |
| CPUs in some sleep loop or spin loop in ROM where you can get | |
| them out via a soft reset or some other means, in which case | |
| you don't need to care, or you'll have to enter the kernel | |
| with all CPUs. The way to do that with method b) will be | |
| described in a later revision of this document. | |
| Board supports (platforms) are not exclusive config options. An | |
| arbitrary set of board supports can be built in a single kernel | |
| image. The kernel will "know" what set of functions to use for a | |
| given platform based on the content of the device-tree. Thus, you | |
| should: | |
| a) add your platform support as a _boolean_ option in | |
| arch/powerpc/Kconfig, following the example of PPC_PSERIES | |
| and PPC_PMAC. The latter is probably a good | |
| example of a board support to start from. | |
| b) create your main platform file as | |
| "arch/powerpc/platforms/myplatform/myboard_setup.c" and add it | |
| to the Makefile under the condition of your ``CONFIG_`` | |
| option. This file will define a structure of type "ppc_md" | |
| containing the various callbacks that the generic code will | |
| use to get to your platform specific code | |
| A kernel image may support multiple platforms, but only if the | |
| platforms feature the same core architecture. A single kernel build | |
| cannot support both configurations with Book E and configurations | |
| with classic Powerpc architectures. |