| =========================== | |
| SipHash - a short input PRF | |
| =========================== | |
| :Author: Written by Jason A. Donenfeld <jason@zx2c4.com> | |
| SipHash is a cryptographically secure PRF -- a keyed hash function -- that | |
| performs very well for short inputs, hence the name. It was designed by | |
| cryptographers Daniel J. Bernstein and Jean-Philippe Aumasson. It is intended | |
| as a replacement for some uses of: `jhash`, `md5_transform`, `sha1_transform`, | |
| and so forth. | |
| SipHash takes a secret key filled with randomly generated numbers and either | |
| an input buffer or several input integers. It spits out an integer that is | |
| indistinguishable from random. You may then use that integer as part of secure | |
| sequence numbers, secure cookies, or mask it off for use in a hash table. | |
| Generating a key | |
| ================ | |
| Keys should always be generated from a cryptographically secure source of | |
| random numbers, either using get_random_bytes or get_random_once:: | |
| siphash_key_t key; | |
| get_random_bytes(&key, sizeof(key)); | |
| If you're not deriving your key from here, you're doing it wrong. | |
| Using the functions | |
| =================== | |
| There are two variants of the function, one that takes a list of integers, and | |
| one that takes a buffer:: | |
| u64 siphash(const void *data, size_t len, const siphash_key_t *key); | |
| And:: | |
| u64 siphash_1u64(u64, const siphash_key_t *key); | |
| u64 siphash_2u64(u64, u64, const siphash_key_t *key); | |
| u64 siphash_3u64(u64, u64, u64, const siphash_key_t *key); | |
| u64 siphash_4u64(u64, u64, u64, u64, const siphash_key_t *key); | |
| u64 siphash_1u32(u32, const siphash_key_t *key); | |
| u64 siphash_2u32(u32, u32, const siphash_key_t *key); | |
| u64 siphash_3u32(u32, u32, u32, const siphash_key_t *key); | |
| u64 siphash_4u32(u32, u32, u32, u32, const siphash_key_t *key); | |
| If you pass the generic siphash function something of a constant length, it | |
| will constant fold at compile-time and automatically choose one of the | |
| optimized functions. | |
| Hashtable key function usage:: | |
| struct some_hashtable { | |
| DECLARE_HASHTABLE(hashtable, 8); | |
| siphash_key_t key; | |
| }; | |
| void init_hashtable(struct some_hashtable *table) | |
| { | |
| get_random_bytes(&table->key, sizeof(table->key)); | |
| } | |
| static inline hlist_head *some_hashtable_bucket(struct some_hashtable *table, struct interesting_input *input) | |
| { | |
| return &table->hashtable[siphash(input, sizeof(*input), &table->key) & (HASH_SIZE(table->hashtable) - 1)]; | |
| } | |
| You may then iterate like usual over the returned hash bucket. | |
| Security | |
| ======== | |
| SipHash has a very high security margin, with its 128-bit key. So long as the | |
| key is kept secret, it is impossible for an attacker to guess the outputs of | |
| the function, even if being able to observe many outputs, since 2^128 outputs | |
| is significant. | |
| Linux implements the "2-4" variant of SipHash. | |
| Struct-passing Pitfalls | |
| ======================= | |
| Often times the XuY functions will not be large enough, and instead you'll | |
| want to pass a pre-filled struct to siphash. When doing this, it's important | |
| to always ensure the struct has no padding holes. The easiest way to do this | |
| is to simply arrange the members of the struct in descending order of size, | |
| and to use offsetofend() instead of sizeof() for getting the size. For | |
| performance reasons, if possible, it's probably a good thing to align the | |
| struct to the right boundary. Here's an example:: | |
| const struct { | |
| struct in6_addr saddr; | |
| u32 counter; | |
| u16 dport; | |
| } __aligned(SIPHASH_ALIGNMENT) combined = { | |
| .saddr = *(struct in6_addr *)saddr, | |
| .counter = counter, | |
| .dport = dport | |
| }; | |
| u64 h = siphash(&combined, offsetofend(typeof(combined), dport), &secret); | |
| Resources | |
| ========= | |
| Read the SipHash paper if you're interested in learning more: | |
| https://131002.net/siphash/siphash.pdf | |
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
| =============================================== | |
| HalfSipHash - SipHash's insecure younger cousin | |
| =============================================== | |
| :Author: Written by Jason A. Donenfeld <jason@zx2c4.com> | |
| On the off-chance that SipHash is not fast enough for your needs, you might be | |
| able to justify using HalfSipHash, a terrifying but potentially useful | |
| possibility. HalfSipHash cuts SipHash's rounds down from "2-4" to "1-3" and, | |
| even scarier, uses an easily brute-forcable 64-bit key (with a 32-bit output) | |
| instead of SipHash's 128-bit key. However, this may appeal to some | |
| high-performance `jhash` users. | |
| HalfSipHash support is provided through the "hsiphash" family of functions. | |
| .. warning:: | |
| Do not ever use the hsiphash functions except for as a hashtable key | |
| function, and only then when you can be absolutely certain that the outputs | |
| will never be transmitted out of the kernel. This is only remotely useful | |
| over `jhash` as a means of mitigating hashtable flooding denial of service | |
| attacks. | |
| On 64-bit kernels, the hsiphash functions actually implement SipHash-1-3, a | |
| reduced-round variant of SipHash, instead of HalfSipHash-1-3. This is because in | |
| 64-bit code, SipHash-1-3 is no slower than HalfSipHash-1-3, and can be faster. | |
| Note, this does *not* mean that in 64-bit kernels the hsiphash functions are the | |
| same as the siphash ones, or that they are secure; the hsiphash functions still | |
| use a less secure reduced-round algorithm and truncate their outputs to 32 | |
| bits. | |
| Generating a hsiphash key | |
| ========================= | |
| Keys should always be generated from a cryptographically secure source of | |
| random numbers, either using get_random_bytes or get_random_once:: | |
| hsiphash_key_t key; | |
| get_random_bytes(&key, sizeof(key)); | |
| If you're not deriving your key from here, you're doing it wrong. | |
| Using the hsiphash functions | |
| ============================ | |
| There are two variants of the function, one that takes a list of integers, and | |
| one that takes a buffer:: | |
| u32 hsiphash(const void *data, size_t len, const hsiphash_key_t *key); | |
| And:: | |
| u32 hsiphash_1u32(u32, const hsiphash_key_t *key); | |
| u32 hsiphash_2u32(u32, u32, const hsiphash_key_t *key); | |
| u32 hsiphash_3u32(u32, u32, u32, const hsiphash_key_t *key); | |
| u32 hsiphash_4u32(u32, u32, u32, u32, const hsiphash_key_t *key); | |
| If you pass the generic hsiphash function something of a constant length, it | |
| will constant fold at compile-time and automatically choose one of the | |
| optimized functions. | |
| Hashtable key function usage | |
| ============================ | |
| :: | |
| struct some_hashtable { | |
| DECLARE_HASHTABLE(hashtable, 8); | |
| hsiphash_key_t key; | |
| }; | |
| void init_hashtable(struct some_hashtable *table) | |
| { | |
| get_random_bytes(&table->key, sizeof(table->key)); | |
| } | |
| static inline hlist_head *some_hashtable_bucket(struct some_hashtable *table, struct interesting_input *input) | |
| { | |
| return &table->hashtable[hsiphash(input, sizeof(*input), &table->key) & (HASH_SIZE(table->hashtable) - 1)]; | |
| } | |
| You may then iterate like usual over the returned hash bucket. | |
| Performance | |
| =========== | |
| hsiphash() is roughly 3 times slower than jhash(). For many replacements, this | |
| will not be a problem, as the hashtable lookup isn't the bottleneck. And in | |
| general, this is probably a good sacrifice to make for the security and DoS | |
| resistance of hsiphash(). |