| =========== | |
| Deferred IO | |
| =========== | |
| Deferred IO is a way to delay and repurpose IO. It uses host memory as a | |
| buffer and the MMU pagefault as a pretrigger for when to perform the device | |
| IO. The following example may be a useful explanation of how one such setup | |
| works: | |
| - userspace app like Xfbdev mmaps framebuffer | |
| - deferred IO and driver sets up fault and page_mkwrite handlers | |
| - userspace app tries to write to mmapped vaddress | |
| - we get pagefault and reach fault handler | |
| - fault handler finds and returns physical page | |
| - we get page_mkwrite where we add this page to a list | |
| - schedule a workqueue task to be run after a delay | |
| - app continues writing to that page with no additional cost. this is | |
| the key benefit. | |
| - the workqueue task comes in and mkcleans the pages on the list, then | |
| completes the work associated with updating the framebuffer. this is | |
| the real work talking to the device. | |
| - app tries to write to the address (that has now been mkcleaned) | |
| - get pagefault and the above sequence occurs again | |
| As can be seen from above, one benefit is roughly to allow bursty framebuffer | |
| writes to occur at minimum cost. Then after some time when hopefully things | |
| have gone quiet, we go and really update the framebuffer which would be | |
| a relatively more expensive operation. | |
| For some types of nonvolatile high latency displays, the desired image is | |
| the final image rather than the intermediate stages which is why it's okay | |
| to not update for each write that is occurring. | |
| It may be the case that this is useful in other scenarios as well. Paul Mundt | |
| has mentioned a case where it is beneficial to use the page count to decide | |
| whether to coalesce and issue SG DMA or to do memory bursts. | |
| Another one may be if one has a device framebuffer that is in an usual format, | |
| say diagonally shifting RGB, this may then be a mechanism for you to allow | |
| apps to pretend to have a normal framebuffer but reswizzle for the device | |
| framebuffer at vsync time based on the touched pagelist. | |
| How to use it: (for applications) | |
| --------------------------------- | |
| No changes needed. mmap the framebuffer like normal and just use it. | |
| How to use it: (for fbdev drivers) | |
| ---------------------------------- | |
| The following example may be helpful. | |
| 1. Setup your structure. Eg:: | |
| static struct fb_deferred_io hecubafb_defio = { | |
| .delay = HZ, | |
| .deferred_io = hecubafb_dpy_deferred_io, | |
| }; | |
| The delay is the minimum delay between when the page_mkwrite trigger occurs | |
| and when the deferred_io callback is called. The deferred_io callback is | |
| explained below. | |
| 2. Setup your deferred IO callback. Eg:: | |
| static void hecubafb_dpy_deferred_io(struct fb_info *info, | |
| struct list_head *pagelist) | |
| The deferred_io callback is where you would perform all your IO to the display | |
| device. You receive the pagelist which is the list of pages that were written | |
| to during the delay. You must not modify this list. This callback is called | |
| from a workqueue. | |
| 3. Call init:: | |
| info->fbdefio = &hecubafb_defio; | |
| fb_deferred_io_init(info); | |
| 4. Call cleanup:: | |
| fb_deferred_io_cleanup(info); |