[Bluetooth] Fix deadlock in the L2CAP layer

The Bluetooth L2CAP layer has 2 locks that are used in softirq context,
(one spinlock and one rwlock, where the softirq usage is readlock) but
where not all usages of the lock were _bh safe. The patch below corrects
this.

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
index fc1b54f..9d2d1d6 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
@@ -168,9 +168,9 @@
 static inline void l2cap_chan_add(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sock *sk, struct sock *parent)
 {
 	struct l2cap_chan_list *l = &conn->chan_list;
-	write_lock(&l->lock);
+	write_lock_bh(&l->lock);
 	__l2cap_chan_add(conn, sk, parent);
-	write_unlock(&l->lock);
+	write_unlock_bh(&l->lock);
 }
 
 static inline u8 l2cap_get_ident(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
@@ -183,14 +183,14 @@
 	 *  200 - 254 are used by utilities like l2ping, etc.
 	 */
 
-	spin_lock(&conn->lock);
+	spin_lock_bh(&conn->lock);
 
 	if (++conn->tx_ident > 128)
 		conn->tx_ident = 1;
 
 	id = conn->tx_ident;
 
-	spin_unlock(&conn->lock);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&conn->lock);
 
 	return id;
 }
@@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@
 {
 	struct sock *next = l2cap_pi(sk)->next_c, *prev = l2cap_pi(sk)->prev_c;
 
-	write_lock(&l->lock);
+	write_lock_bh(&l->lock);
 	if (sk == l->head)
 		l->head = next;
 
@@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@
 		l2cap_pi(next)->prev_c = prev;
 	if (prev)
 		l2cap_pi(prev)->next_c = next;
-	write_unlock(&l->lock);
+	write_unlock_bh(&l->lock);
 
 	__sock_put(sk);
 }
@@ -1425,11 +1425,11 @@
 	if (!sk)
 		goto response;
 
-	write_lock(&list->lock);
+	write_lock_bh(&list->lock);
 
 	/* Check if we already have channel with that dcid */
 	if (__l2cap_get_chan_by_dcid(list, scid)) {
-		write_unlock(&list->lock);
+		write_unlock_bh(&list->lock);
 		sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED);
 		l2cap_sock_kill(sk);
 		goto response;
@@ -1467,7 +1467,7 @@
 	result = status = 0;
 
 done:
-	write_unlock(&list->lock);
+	write_unlock_bh(&list->lock);
 
 response:
 	bh_unlock_sock(parent);