| /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ | |
| #ifndef _ASM_HASH_H | |
| #define _ASM_HASH_H | |
| /* | |
| * Fortunately, most people who want to run Linux on Microblaze enable | |
| * both multiplier and barrel shifter, but omitting them is technically | |
| * a supported configuration. | |
| * | |
| * With just a barrel shifter, we can implement an efficient constant | |
| * multiply using shifts and adds. GCC can find a 9-step solution, but | |
| * this 6-step solution was found by Yevgen Voronenko's implementation | |
| * of the Hcub algorithm at http://spiral.ece.cmu.edu/mcm/gen.html. | |
| * | |
| * That software is really not designed for a single multiplier this large, | |
| * but if you run it enough times with different seeds, it'll find several | |
| * 6-shift, 6-add sequences for computing x * 0x61C88647. They are all | |
| * c = (x << 19) + x; | |
| * a = (x << 9) + c; | |
| * b = (x << 23) + a; | |
| * return (a<<11) + (b<<6) + (c<<3) - b; | |
| * with variations on the order of the final add. | |
| * | |
| * Without even a shifter, it's hopless; any hash function will suck. | |
| */ | |
| #if CONFIG_XILINX_MICROBLAZE0_USE_HW_MUL == 0 | |
| #define HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 1 | |
| /* Multiply by GOLDEN_RATIO_32 = 0x61C88647 */ | |
| static inline u32 __attribute_const__ __hash_32(u32 a) | |
| { | |
| #if CONFIG_XILINX_MICROBLAZE0_USE_BARREL | |
| unsigned int b, c; | |
| /* Phase 1: Compute three intermediate values */ | |
| b = a << 23; | |
| c = (a << 19) + a; | |
| a = (a << 9) + c; | |
| b += a; | |
| /* Phase 2: Compute (a << 11) + (b << 6) + (c << 3) - b */ | |
| a <<= 5; | |
| a += b; /* (a << 5) + b */ | |
| a <<= 3; | |
| a += c; /* (a << 8) + (b << 3) + c */ | |
| a <<= 3; | |
| return a - b; /* (a << 11) + (b << 6) + (c << 3) - b */ | |
| #else | |
| /* | |
| * "This is really going to hurt." | |
| * | |
| * Without a barrel shifter, left shifts are implemented as | |
| * repeated additions, and the best we can do is an optimal | |
| * addition-subtraction chain. This one is not known to be | |
| * optimal, but at 37 steps, it's decent for a 31-bit multiplier. | |
| * | |
| * Question: given its size (37*4 = 148 bytes per instance), | |
| * and slowness, is this worth having inline? | |
| */ | |
| unsigned int b, c, d; | |
| b = a << 4; /* 4 */ | |
| c = b << 1; /* 1 5 */ | |
| b += a; /* 1 6 */ | |
| c += b; /* 1 7 */ | |
| c <<= 3; /* 3 10 */ | |
| c -= a; /* 1 11 */ | |
| d = c << 7; /* 7 18 */ | |
| d += b; /* 1 19 */ | |
| d <<= 8; /* 8 27 */ | |
| d += a; /* 1 28 */ | |
| d <<= 1; /* 1 29 */ | |
| d += b; /* 1 30 */ | |
| d <<= 6; /* 6 36 */ | |
| return d + c; /* 1 37 total instructions*/ | |
| #endif | |
| } | |
| #endif /* !CONFIG_XILINX_MICROBLAZE0_USE_HW_MUL */ | |
| #endif /* _ASM_HASH_H */ |