|  | <head> | 
|  | <style> p { max-width:50em} ol, ul {max-width: 40em}</style> | 
|  | </head> | 
|  |  | 
|  | Pathname lookup in Linux. | 
|  | ========================= | 
|  |  | 
|  | This write-up is based on three articles published at lwn.net: | 
|  |  | 
|  | - <https://lwn.net/Articles/649115/> Pathname lookup in Linux | 
|  | - <https://lwn.net/Articles/649729/> RCU-walk: faster pathname lookup in Linux | 
|  | - <https://lwn.net/Articles/650786/> A walk among the symlinks | 
|  |  | 
|  | Written by Neil Brown with help from Al Viro and Jon Corbet. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Introduction | 
|  | ------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | The most obvious aspect of pathname lookup, which very little | 
|  | exploration is needed to discover, is that it is complex.  There are | 
|  | many rules, special cases, and implementation alternatives that all | 
|  | combine to confuse the unwary reader.  Computer science has long been | 
|  | acquainted with such complexity and has tools to help manage it.  One | 
|  | tool that we will make extensive use of is "divide and conquer".  For | 
|  | the early parts of the analysis we will divide off symlinks - leaving | 
|  | them until the final part.  Well before we get to symlinks we have | 
|  | another major division based on the VFS's approach to locking which | 
|  | will allow us to review "REF-walk" and "RCU-walk" separately.  But we | 
|  | are getting ahead of ourselves.  There are some important low level | 
|  | distinctions we need to clarify first. | 
|  |  | 
|  | There are two sorts of ... | 
|  | -------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | [`openat()`]: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/openat.2.html | 
|  |  | 
|  | Pathnames (sometimes "file names"), used to identify objects in the | 
|  | filesystem, will be familiar to most readers.  They contain two sorts | 
|  | of elements: "slashes" that are sequences of one or more "`/`" | 
|  | characters, and "components" that are sequences of one or more | 
|  | non-"`/`" characters.  These form two kinds of paths.  Those that | 
|  | start with slashes are "absolute" and start from the filesystem root. | 
|  | The others are "relative" and start from the current directory, or | 
|  | from some other location specified by a file descriptor given to a | 
|  | "xxx`at`" system call such as "[`openat()`]". | 
|  |  | 
|  | [`execveat()`]: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/execveat.2.html | 
|  |  | 
|  | It is tempting to describe the second kind as starting with a | 
|  | component, but that isn't always accurate: a pathname can lack both | 
|  | slashes and components, it can be empty, in other words.  This is | 
|  | generally forbidden in POSIX, but some of those "xxx`at`" system calls | 
|  | in Linux permit it when the `AT_EMPTY_PATH` flag is given.  For | 
|  | example, if you have an open file descriptor on an executable file you | 
|  | can execute it by calling [`execveat()`] passing the file descriptor, | 
|  | an empty path, and the `AT_EMPTY_PATH` flag. | 
|  |  | 
|  | These paths can be divided into two sections: the final component and | 
|  | everything else.  The "everything else" is the easy bit.  In all cases | 
|  | it must identify a directory that already exists, otherwise an error | 
|  | such as `ENOENT` or `ENOTDIR` will be reported. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The final component is not so simple.  Not only do different system | 
|  | calls interpret it quite differently (e.g. some create it, some do | 
|  | not), but it might not even exist: neither the empty pathname nor the | 
|  | pathname that is just slashes have a final component.  If it does | 
|  | exist, it could be "`.`" or "`..`" which are handled quite differently | 
|  | from other components. | 
|  |  | 
|  | [POSIX]: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap04.html#tag_04_12 | 
|  |  | 
|  | If a pathname ends with a slash, such as "`/tmp/foo/`" it might be | 
|  | tempting to consider that to have an empty final component.  In many | 
|  | ways that would lead to correct results, but not always.  In | 
|  | particular, `mkdir()` and `rmdir()` each create or remove a directory named | 
|  | by the final component, and they are required to work with pathnames | 
|  | ending in "`/`".  According to [POSIX] | 
|  |  | 
|  | > A pathname that contains at least one non- <slash> character and | 
|  | > that ends with one or more trailing <slash> characters shall not | 
|  | > be resolved successfully unless the last pathname component before | 
|  | > the trailing <slash> characters names an existing directory or a | 
|  | > directory entry that is to be created for a directory immediately | 
|  | > after the pathname is resolved. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The Linux pathname walking code (mostly in `fs/namei.c`) deals with | 
|  | all of these issues: breaking the path into components, handling the | 
|  | "everything else" quite separately from the final component, and | 
|  | checking that the trailing slash is not used where it isn't | 
|  | permitted.  It also addresses the important issue of concurrent | 
|  | access. | 
|  |  | 
|  | While one process is looking up a pathname, another might be making | 
|  | changes that affect that lookup.  One fairly extreme case is that if | 
|  | "a/b" were renamed to "a/c/b" while another process were looking up | 
|  | "a/b/..", that process might successfully resolve on "a/c". | 
|  | Most races are much more subtle, and a big part of the task of | 
|  | pathname lookup is to prevent them from having damaging effects.  Many | 
|  | of the possible races are seen most clearly in the context of the | 
|  | "dcache" and an understanding of that is central to understanding | 
|  | pathname lookup. | 
|  |  | 
|  | More than just a cache. | 
|  | ----------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | The "dcache" caches information about names in each filesystem to | 
|  | make them quickly available for lookup.  Each entry (known as a | 
|  | "dentry") contains three significant fields: a component name, a | 
|  | pointer to a parent dentry, and a pointer to the "inode" which | 
|  | contains further information about the object in that parent with | 
|  | the given name.  The inode pointer can be `NULL` indicating that the | 
|  | name doesn't exist in the parent.  While there can be linkage in the | 
|  | dentry of a directory to the dentries of the children, that linkage is | 
|  | not used for pathname lookup, and so will not be considered here. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The dcache has a number of uses apart from accelerating lookup.  One | 
|  | that will be particularly relevant is that it is closely integrated | 
|  | with the mount table that records which filesystem is mounted where. | 
|  | What the mount table actually stores is which dentry is mounted on top | 
|  | of which other dentry. | 
|  |  | 
|  | When considering the dcache, we have another of our "two types" | 
|  | distinctions: there are two types of filesystems. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Some filesystems ensure that the information in the dcache is always | 
|  | completely accurate (though not necessarily complete).  This can allow | 
|  | the VFS to determine if a particular file does or doesn't exist | 
|  | without checking with the filesystem, and means that the VFS can | 
|  | protect the filesystem against certain races and other problems. | 
|  | These are typically "local" filesystems such as ext3, XFS, and Btrfs. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Other filesystems don't provide that guarantee because they cannot. | 
|  | These are typically filesystems that are shared across a network, | 
|  | whether remote filesystems like NFS and 9P, or cluster filesystems | 
|  | like ocfs2 or cephfs.  These filesystems allow the VFS to revalidate | 
|  | cached information, and must provide their own protection against | 
|  | awkward races.  The VFS can detect these filesystems by the | 
|  | `DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE` flag being set in the dentry. | 
|  |  | 
|  | REF-walk: simple concurrency management with refcounts and spinlocks | 
|  | -------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | With all of those divisions carefully classified, we can now start | 
|  | looking at the actual process of walking along a path.  In particular | 
|  | we will start with the handling of the "everything else" part of a | 
|  | pathname, and focus on the "REF-walk" approach to concurrency | 
|  | management.  This code is found in the `link_path_walk()` function, if | 
|  | you ignore all the places that only run when "`LOOKUP_RCU`" | 
|  | (indicating the use of RCU-walk) is set. | 
|  |  | 
|  | [Meet the Lockers]: https://lwn.net/Articles/453685/ | 
|  |  | 
|  | REF-walk is fairly heavy-handed with locks and reference counts.  Not | 
|  | as heavy-handed as in the old "big kernel lock" days, but certainly not | 
|  | afraid of taking a lock when one is needed.  It uses a variety of | 
|  | different concurrency controls.  A background understanding of the | 
|  | various primitives is assumed, or can be gleaned from elsewhere such | 
|  | as in [Meet the Lockers]. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The locking mechanisms used by REF-walk include: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ### dentry->d_lockref ### | 
|  |  | 
|  | This uses the lockref primitive to provide both a spinlock and a | 
|  | reference count.  The special-sauce of this primitive is that the | 
|  | conceptual sequence "lock; inc_ref; unlock;" can often be performed | 
|  | with a single atomic memory operation. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Holding a reference on a dentry ensures that the dentry won't suddenly | 
|  | be freed and used for something else, so the values in various fields | 
|  | will behave as expected.  It also protects the `->d_inode` reference | 
|  | to the inode to some extent. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The association between a dentry and its inode is fairly permanent. | 
|  | For example, when a file is renamed, the dentry and inode move | 
|  | together to the new location.  When a file is created the dentry will | 
|  | initially be negative (i.e. `d_inode` is `NULL`), and will be assigned | 
|  | to the new inode as part of the act of creation. | 
|  |  | 
|  | When a file is deleted, this can be reflected in the cache either by | 
|  | setting `d_inode` to `NULL`, or by removing it from the hash table | 
|  | (described shortly) used to look up the name in the parent directory. | 
|  | If the dentry is still in use the second option is used as it is | 
|  | perfectly legal to keep using an open file after it has been deleted | 
|  | and having the dentry around helps.  If the dentry is not otherwise in | 
|  | use (i.e. if the refcount in `d_lockref` is one), only then will | 
|  | `d_inode` be set to `NULL`.  Doing it this way is more efficient for a | 
|  | very common case. | 
|  |  | 
|  | So as long as a counted reference is held to a dentry, a non-`NULL` `->d_inode` | 
|  | value will never be changed. | 
|  |  | 
|  | ### dentry->d_lock ### | 
|  |  | 
|  | `d_lock` is a synonym for the spinlock that is part of `d_lockref` above. | 
|  | For our purposes, holding this lock protects against the dentry being | 
|  | renamed or unlinked.  In particular, its parent (`d_parent`), and its | 
|  | name (`d_name`) cannot be changed, and it cannot be removed from the | 
|  | dentry hash table. | 
|  |  | 
|  | When looking for a name in a directory, REF-walk takes `d_lock` on | 
|  | each candidate dentry that it finds in the hash table and then checks | 
|  | that the parent and name are correct.  So it doesn't lock the parent | 
|  | while searching in the cache; it only locks children. | 
|  |  | 
|  | When looking for the parent for a given name (to handle "`..`"), | 
|  | REF-walk can take `d_lock` to get a stable reference to `d_parent`, | 
|  | but it first tries a more lightweight approach.  As seen in | 
|  | `dget_parent()`, if a reference can be claimed on the parent, and if | 
|  | subsequently `d_parent` can be seen to have not changed, then there is | 
|  | no need to actually take the lock on the child. | 
|  |  | 
|  | ### rename_lock ### | 
|  |  | 
|  | Looking up a given name in a given directory involves computing a hash | 
|  | from the two values (the name and the dentry of the directory), | 
|  | accessing that slot in a hash table, and searching the linked list | 
|  | that is found there. | 
|  |  | 
|  | When a dentry is renamed, the name and the parent dentry can both | 
|  | change so the hash will almost certainly change too.  This would move the | 
|  | dentry to a different chain in the hash table.  If a filename search | 
|  | happened to be looking at a dentry that was moved in this way, | 
|  | it might end up continuing the search down the wrong chain, | 
|  | and so miss out on part of the correct chain. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The name-lookup process (`d_lookup()`) does _not_ try to prevent this | 
|  | from happening, but only to detect when it happens. | 
|  | `rename_lock` is a seqlock that is updated whenever any dentry is | 
|  | renamed.  If `d_lookup` finds that a rename happened while it | 
|  | unsuccessfully scanned a chain in the hash table, it simply tries | 
|  | again. | 
|  |  | 
|  | ### inode->i_mutex ### | 
|  |  | 
|  | `i_mutex` is a mutex that serializes all changes to a particular | 
|  | directory.  This ensures that, for example, an `unlink()` and a `rename()` | 
|  | cannot both happen at the same time.  It also keeps the directory | 
|  | stable while the filesystem is asked to look up a name that is not | 
|  | currently in the dcache. | 
|  |  | 
|  | This has a complementary role to that of `d_lock`: `i_mutex` on a | 
|  | directory protects all of the names in that directory, while `d_lock` | 
|  | on a name protects just one name in a directory.  Most changes to the | 
|  | dcache hold `i_mutex` on the relevant directory inode and briefly take | 
|  | `d_lock` on one or more the dentries while the change happens.  One | 
|  | exception is when idle dentries are removed from the dcache due to | 
|  | memory pressure.  This uses `d_lock`, but `i_mutex` plays no role. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The mutex affects pathname lookup in two distinct ways.  Firstly it | 
|  | serializes lookup of a name in a directory.  `walk_component()` uses | 
|  | `lookup_fast()` first which, in turn, checks to see if the name is in the cache, | 
|  | using only `d_lock` locking.  If the name isn't found, then `walk_component()` | 
|  | falls back to `lookup_slow()` which takes `i_mutex`, checks again that | 
|  | the name isn't in the cache, and then calls in to the filesystem to get a | 
|  | definitive answer.  A new dentry will be added to the cache regardless of | 
|  | the result. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Secondly, when pathname lookup reaches the final component, it will | 
|  | sometimes need to take `i_mutex` before performing the last lookup so | 
|  | that the required exclusion can be achieved.  How path lookup chooses | 
|  | to take, or not take, `i_mutex` is one of the | 
|  | issues addressed in a subsequent section. | 
|  |  | 
|  | ### mnt->mnt_count ### | 
|  |  | 
|  | `mnt_count` is a per-CPU reference counter on "`mount`" structures. | 
|  | Per-CPU here means that incrementing the count is cheap as it only | 
|  | uses CPU-local memory, but checking if the count is zero is expensive as | 
|  | it needs to check with every CPU.  Taking a `mnt_count` reference | 
|  | prevents the mount structure from disappearing as the result of regular | 
|  | unmount operations, but does not prevent a "lazy" unmount.  So holding | 
|  | `mnt_count` doesn't ensure that the mount remains in the namespace and, | 
|  | in particular, doesn't stabilize the link to the mounted-on dentry.  It | 
|  | does, however, ensure that the `mount` data structure remains coherent, | 
|  | and it provides a reference to the root dentry of the mounted | 
|  | filesystem.  So a reference through `->mnt_count` provides a stable | 
|  | reference to the mounted dentry, but not the mounted-on dentry. | 
|  |  | 
|  | ### mount_lock ### | 
|  |  | 
|  | `mount_lock` is a global seqlock, a bit like `rename_lock`.  It can be used to | 
|  | check if any change has been made to any mount points. | 
|  |  | 
|  | While walking down the tree (away from the root) this lock is used when | 
|  | crossing a mount point to check that the crossing was safe.  That is, | 
|  | the value in the seqlock is read, then the code finds the mount that | 
|  | is mounted on the current directory, if there is one, and increments | 
|  | the `mnt_count`.  Finally the value in `mount_lock` is checked against | 
|  | the old value.  If there is no change, then the crossing was safe.  If there | 
|  | was a change, the `mnt_count` is decremented and the whole process is | 
|  | retried. | 
|  |  | 
|  | When walking up the tree (towards the root) by following a ".." link, | 
|  | a little more care is needed.  In this case the seqlock (which | 
|  | contains both a counter and a spinlock) is fully locked to prevent | 
|  | any changes to any mount points while stepping up.  This locking is | 
|  | needed to stabilize the link to the mounted-on dentry, which the | 
|  | refcount on the mount itself doesn't ensure. | 
|  |  | 
|  | ### RCU ### | 
|  |  | 
|  | Finally the global (but extremely lightweight) RCU read lock is held | 
|  | from time to time to ensure certain data structures don't get freed | 
|  | unexpectedly. | 
|  |  | 
|  | In particular it is held while scanning chains in the dcache hash | 
|  | table, and the mount point hash table. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Bringing it together with `struct nameidata` | 
|  | -------------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | [First edition Unix]: http://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V1/u2.s | 
|  |  | 
|  | Throughout the process of walking a path, the current status is stored | 
|  | in a `struct nameidata`, "namei" being the traditional name - dating | 
|  | all the way back to [First Edition Unix] - of the function that | 
|  | converts a "name" to an "inode".  `struct nameidata` contains (among | 
|  | other fields): | 
|  |  | 
|  | ### `struct path path` ### | 
|  |  | 
|  | A `path` contains a `struct vfsmount` (which is | 
|  | embedded in a `struct mount`) and a `struct dentry`.  Together these | 
|  | record the current status of the walk.  They start out referring to the | 
|  | starting point (the current working directory, the root directory, or some other | 
|  | directory identified by a file descriptor), and are updated on each | 
|  | step.  A reference through `d_lockref` and `mnt_count` is always | 
|  | held. | 
|  |  | 
|  | ### `struct qstr last` ### | 
|  |  | 
|  | This is a string together with a length (i.e. _not_ `nul` terminated) | 
|  | that is the "next" component in the pathname. | 
|  |  | 
|  | ### `int last_type` ### | 
|  |  | 
|  | This is one of `LAST_NORM`, `LAST_ROOT`, `LAST_DOT`, `LAST_DOTDOT`, or | 
|  | `LAST_BIND`.  The `last` field is only valid if the type is | 
|  | `LAST_NORM`.  `LAST_BIND` is used when following a symlink and no | 
|  | components of the symlink have been processed yet.  Others should be | 
|  | fairly self-explanatory. | 
|  |  | 
|  | ### `struct path root` ### | 
|  |  | 
|  | This is used to hold a reference to the effective root of the | 
|  | filesystem.  Often that reference won't be needed, so this field is | 
|  | only assigned the first time it is used, or when a non-standard root | 
|  | is requested.  Keeping a reference in the `nameidata` ensures that | 
|  | only one root is in effect for the entire path walk, even if it races | 
|  | with a `chroot()` system call. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The root is needed when either of two conditions holds: (1) either the | 
|  | pathname or a symbolic link starts with a "'/'", or (2) a "`..`" | 
|  | component is being handled, since "`..`" from the root must always stay | 
|  | at the root.  The value used is usually the current root directory of | 
|  | the calling process.  An alternate root can be provided as when | 
|  | `sysctl()` calls `file_open_root()`, and when NFSv4 or Btrfs call | 
|  | `mount_subtree()`.  In each case a pathname is being looked up in a very | 
|  | specific part of the filesystem, and the lookup must not be allowed to | 
|  | escape that subtree.  It works a bit like a local `chroot()`. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Ignoring the handling of symbolic links, we can now describe the | 
|  | "`link_path_walk()`" function, which handles the lookup of everything | 
|  | except the final component as: | 
|  |  | 
|  | >  Given a path (`name`) and a nameidata structure (`nd`), check that the | 
|  | >  current directory has execute permission and then advance `name` | 
|  | >  over one component while updating `last_type` and `last`.  If that | 
|  | >  was the final component, then return, otherwise call | 
|  | >  `walk_component()` and repeat from the top. | 
|  |  | 
|  | `walk_component()` is even easier.  If the component is `LAST_DOTS`, | 
|  | it calls `handle_dots()` which does the necessary locking as already | 
|  | described.  If it finds a `LAST_NORM` component it first calls | 
|  | "`lookup_fast()`" which only looks in the dcache, but will ask the | 
|  | filesystem to revalidate the result if it is that sort of filesystem. | 
|  | If that doesn't get a good result, it calls "`lookup_slow()`" which | 
|  | takes the `i_mutex`, rechecks the cache, and then asks the filesystem | 
|  | to find a definitive answer.  Each of these will call | 
|  | `follow_managed()` (as described below) to handle any mount points. | 
|  |  | 
|  | In the absence of symbolic links, `walk_component()` creates a new | 
|  | `struct path` containing a counted reference to the new dentry and a | 
|  | reference to the new `vfsmount` which is only counted if it is | 
|  | different from the previous `vfsmount`.  It then calls | 
|  | `path_to_nameidata()` to install the new `struct path` in the | 
|  | `struct nameidata` and drop the unneeded references. | 
|  |  | 
|  | This "hand-over-hand" sequencing of getting a reference to the new | 
|  | dentry before dropping the reference to the previous dentry may | 
|  | seem obvious, but is worth pointing out so that we will recognize its | 
|  | analogue in the "RCU-walk" version. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Handling the final component. | 
|  | ----------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | `link_path_walk()` only walks as far as setting `nd->last` and | 
|  | `nd->last_type` to refer to the final component of the path.  It does | 
|  | not call `walk_component()` that last time.  Handling that final | 
|  | component remains for the caller to sort out. Those callers are | 
|  | `path_lookupat()`, `path_parentat()`, `path_mountpoint()` and | 
|  | `path_openat()` each of which handles the differing requirements of | 
|  | different system calls. | 
|  |  | 
|  | `path_parentat()` is clearly the simplest - it just wraps a little bit | 
|  | of housekeeping around `link_path_walk()` and returns the parent | 
|  | directory and final component to the caller.  The caller will be either | 
|  | aiming to create a name (via `filename_create()`) or remove or rename | 
|  | a name (in which case `user_path_parent()` is used).  They will use | 
|  | `i_mutex` to exclude other changes while they validate and then | 
|  | perform their operation. | 
|  |  | 
|  | `path_lookupat()` is nearly as simple - it is used when an existing | 
|  | object is wanted such as by `stat()` or `chmod()`.  It essentially just | 
|  | calls `walk_component()` on the final component through a call to | 
|  | `lookup_last()`.  `path_lookupat()` returns just the final dentry. | 
|  |  | 
|  | `path_mountpoint()` handles the special case of unmounting which must | 
|  | not try to revalidate the mounted filesystem.  It effectively | 
|  | contains, through a call to `mountpoint_last()`, an alternate | 
|  | implementation of `lookup_slow()` which skips that step.  This is | 
|  | important when unmounting a filesystem that is inaccessible, such as | 
|  | one provided by a dead NFS server. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Finally `path_openat()` is used for the `open()` system call; it | 
|  | contains, in support functions starting with "`do_last()`", all the | 
|  | complexity needed to handle the different subtleties of O_CREAT (with | 
|  | or without O_EXCL), final "`/`" characters, and trailing symbolic | 
|  | links.  We will revisit this in the final part of this series, which | 
|  | focuses on those symbolic links.  "`do_last()`" will sometimes, but | 
|  | not always, take `i_mutex`, depending on what it finds. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Each of these, or the functions which call them, need to be alert to | 
|  | the possibility that the final component is not `LAST_NORM`.  If the | 
|  | goal of the lookup is to create something, then any value for | 
|  | `last_type` other than `LAST_NORM` will result in an error.  For | 
|  | example if `path_parentat()` reports `LAST_DOTDOT`, then the caller | 
|  | won't try to create that name.  They also check for trailing slashes | 
|  | by testing `last.name[last.len]`.  If there is any character beyond | 
|  | the final component, it must be a trailing slash. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Revalidation and automounts | 
|  | --------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Apart from symbolic links, there are only two parts of the "REF-walk" | 
|  | process not yet covered.  One is the handling of stale cache entries | 
|  | and the other is automounts. | 
|  |  | 
|  | On filesystems that require it, the lookup routines will call the | 
|  | `->d_revalidate()` dentry method to ensure that the cached information | 
|  | is current.  This will often confirm validity or update a few details | 
|  | from a server.  In some cases it may find that there has been change | 
|  | further up the path and that something that was thought to be valid | 
|  | previously isn't really.  When this happens the lookup of the whole | 
|  | path is aborted and retried with the "`LOOKUP_REVAL`" flag set.  This | 
|  | forces revalidation to be more thorough.  We will see more details of | 
|  | this retry process in the next article. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Automount points are locations in the filesystem where an attempt to | 
|  | lookup a name can trigger changes to how that lookup should be | 
|  | handled, in particular by mounting a filesystem there.  These are | 
|  | covered in greater detail in autofs4.txt in the Linux documentation | 
|  | tree, but a few notes specifically related to path lookup are in order | 
|  | here. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The Linux VFS has a concept of "managed" dentries which is reflected | 
|  | in function names such as "`follow_managed()`".  There are three | 
|  | potentially interesting things about these dentries corresponding | 
|  | to three different flags that might be set in `dentry->d_flags`: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ### `DCACHE_MANAGE_TRANSIT` ### | 
|  |  | 
|  | If this flag has been set, then the filesystem has requested that the | 
|  | `d_manage()` dentry operation be called before handling any possible | 
|  | mount point.  This can perform two particular services: | 
|  |  | 
|  | It can block to avoid races.  If an automount point is being | 
|  | unmounted, the `d_manage()` function will usually wait for that | 
|  | process to complete before letting the new lookup proceed and possibly | 
|  | trigger a new automount. | 
|  |  | 
|  | It can selectively allow only some processes to transit through a | 
|  | mount point.  When a server process is managing automounts, it may | 
|  | need to access a directory without triggering normal automount | 
|  | processing.  That server process can identify itself to the `autofs` | 
|  | filesystem, which will then give it a special pass through | 
|  | `d_manage()` by returning `-EISDIR`. | 
|  |  | 
|  | ### `DCACHE_MOUNTED` ### | 
|  |  | 
|  | This flag is set on every dentry that is mounted on.  As Linux | 
|  | supports multiple filesystem namespaces, it is possible that the | 
|  | dentry may not be mounted on in *this* namespace, just in some | 
|  | other.  So this flag is seen as a hint, not a promise. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If this flag is set, and `d_manage()` didn't return `-EISDIR`, | 
|  | `lookup_mnt()` is called to examine the mount hash table (honoring the | 
|  | `mount_lock` described earlier) and possibly return a new `vfsmount` | 
|  | and a new `dentry` (both with counted references). | 
|  |  | 
|  | ### `DCACHE_NEED_AUTOMOUNT` ### | 
|  |  | 
|  | If `d_manage()` allowed us to get this far, and `lookup_mnt()` didn't | 
|  | find a mount point, then this flag causes the `d_automount()` dentry | 
|  | operation to be called. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The `d_automount()` operation can be arbitrarily complex and may | 
|  | communicate with server processes etc. but it should ultimately either | 
|  | report that there was an error, that there was nothing to mount, or | 
|  | should provide an updated `struct path` with new `dentry` and `vfsmount`. | 
|  |  | 
|  | In the latter case, `finish_automount()` will be called to safely | 
|  | install the new mount point into the mount table. | 
|  |  | 
|  | There is no new locking of import here and it is important that no | 
|  | locks (only counted references) are held over this processing due to | 
|  | the very real possibility of extended delays. | 
|  | This will become more important next time when we examine RCU-walk | 
|  | which is particularly sensitive to delays. | 
|  |  | 
|  | RCU-walk - faster pathname lookup in Linux | 
|  | ========================================== | 
|  |  | 
|  | RCU-walk is another algorithm for performing pathname lookup in Linux. | 
|  | It is in many ways similar to REF-walk and the two share quite a bit | 
|  | of code.  The significant difference in RCU-walk is how it allows for | 
|  | the possibility of concurrent access. | 
|  |  | 
|  | We noted that REF-walk is complex because there are numerous details | 
|  | and special cases.  RCU-walk reduces this complexity by simply | 
|  | refusing to handle a number of cases -- it instead falls back to | 
|  | REF-walk.  The difficulty with RCU-walk comes from a different | 
|  | direction: unfamiliarity.  The locking rules when depending on RCU are | 
|  | quite different from traditional locking, so we will spend a little extra | 
|  | time when we come to those. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Clear demarcation of roles | 
|  | -------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | The easiest way to manage concurrency is to forcibly stop any other | 
|  | thread from changing the data structures that a given thread is | 
|  | looking at.  In cases where no other thread would even think of | 
|  | changing the data and lots of different threads want to read at the | 
|  | same time, this can be very costly.  Even when using locks that permit | 
|  | multiple concurrent readers, the simple act of updating the count of | 
|  | the number of current readers can impose an unwanted cost.  So the | 
|  | goal when reading a shared data structure that no other process is | 
|  | changing is to avoid writing anything to memory at all.  Take no | 
|  | locks, increment no counts, leave no footprints. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The REF-walk mechanism already described certainly doesn't follow this | 
|  | principle, but then it is really designed to work when there may well | 
|  | be other threads modifying the data.  RCU-walk, in contrast, is | 
|  | designed for the common situation where there are lots of frequent | 
|  | readers and only occasional writers.  This may not be common in all | 
|  | parts of the filesystem tree, but in many parts it will be.  For the | 
|  | other parts it is important that RCU-walk can quickly fall back to | 
|  | using REF-walk. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Pathname lookup always starts in RCU-walk mode but only remains there | 
|  | as long as what it is looking for is in the cache and is stable.  It | 
|  | dances lightly down the cached filesystem image, leaving no footprints | 
|  | and carefully watching where it is, to be sure it doesn't trip.  If it | 
|  | notices that something has changed or is changing, or if something | 
|  | isn't in the cache, then it tries to stop gracefully and switch to | 
|  | REF-walk. | 
|  |  | 
|  | This stopping requires getting a counted reference on the current | 
|  | `vfsmount` and `dentry`, and ensuring that these are still valid - | 
|  | that a path walk with REF-walk would have found the same entries. | 
|  | This is an invariant that RCU-walk must guarantee.  It can only make | 
|  | decisions, such as selecting the next step, that are decisions which | 
|  | REF-walk could also have made if it were walking down the tree at the | 
|  | same time.  If the graceful stop succeeds, the rest of the path is | 
|  | processed with the reliable, if slightly sluggish, REF-walk.  If | 
|  | RCU-walk finds it cannot stop gracefully, it simply gives up and | 
|  | restarts from the top with REF-walk. | 
|  |  | 
|  | This pattern of "try RCU-walk, if that fails try REF-walk" can be | 
|  | clearly seen in functions like `filename_lookup()`, | 
|  | `filename_parentat()`, `filename_mountpoint()`, | 
|  | `do_filp_open()`, and `do_file_open_root()`.  These five | 
|  | correspond roughly to the four `path_`* functions we met earlier, | 
|  | each of which calls `link_path_walk()`.  The `path_*` functions are | 
|  | called using different mode flags until a mode is found which works. | 
|  | They are first called with `LOOKUP_RCU` set to request "RCU-walk".  If | 
|  | that fails with the error `ECHILD` they are called again with no | 
|  | special flag to request "REF-walk".  If either of those report the | 
|  | error `ESTALE` a final attempt is made with `LOOKUP_REVAL` set (and no | 
|  | `LOOKUP_RCU`) to ensure that entries found in the cache are forcibly | 
|  | revalidated - normally entries are only revalidated if the filesystem | 
|  | determines that they are too old to trust. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The `LOOKUP_RCU` attempt may drop that flag internally and switch to | 
|  | REF-walk, but will never then try to switch back to RCU-walk.  Places | 
|  | that trip up RCU-walk are much more likely to be near the leaves and | 
|  | so it is very unlikely that there will be much, if any, benefit from | 
|  | switching back. | 
|  |  | 
|  | RCU and seqlocks: fast and light | 
|  | -------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | RCU is, unsurprisingly, critical to RCU-walk mode.  The | 
|  | `rcu_read_lock()` is held for the entire time that RCU-walk is walking | 
|  | down a path.  The particular guarantee it provides is that the key | 
|  | data structures - dentries, inodes, super_blocks, and mounts - will | 
|  | not be freed while the lock is held.  They might be unlinked or | 
|  | invalidated in one way or another, but the memory will not be | 
|  | repurposed so values in various fields will still be meaningful.  This | 
|  | is the only guarantee that RCU provides; everything else is done using | 
|  | seqlocks. | 
|  |  | 
|  | As we saw above, REF-walk holds a counted reference to the current | 
|  | dentry and the current vfsmount, and does not release those references | 
|  | before taking references to the "next" dentry or vfsmount.  It also | 
|  | sometimes takes the `d_lock` spinlock.  These references and locks are | 
|  | taken to prevent certain changes from happening.  RCU-walk must not | 
|  | take those references or locks and so cannot prevent such changes. | 
|  | Instead, it checks to see if a change has been made, and aborts or | 
|  | retries if it has. | 
|  |  | 
|  | To preserve the invariant mentioned above (that RCU-walk may only make | 
|  | decisions that REF-walk could have made), it must make the checks at | 
|  | or near the same places that REF-walk holds the references.  So, when | 
|  | REF-walk increments a reference count or takes a spinlock, RCU-walk | 
|  | samples the status of a seqlock using `read_seqcount_begin()` or a | 
|  | similar function.  When REF-walk decrements the count or drops the | 
|  | lock, RCU-walk checks if the sampled status is still valid using | 
|  | `read_seqcount_retry()` or similar. | 
|  |  | 
|  | However, there is a little bit more to seqlocks than that.  If | 
|  | RCU-walk accesses two different fields in a seqlock-protected | 
|  | structure, or accesses the same field twice, there is no a priori | 
|  | guarantee of any consistency between those accesses.  When consistency | 
|  | is needed - which it usually is - RCU-walk must take a copy and then | 
|  | use `read_seqcount_retry()` to validate that copy. | 
|  |  | 
|  | `read_seqcount_retry()` not only checks the sequence number, but also | 
|  | imposes a memory barrier so that no memory-read instruction from | 
|  | *before* the call can be delayed until *after* the call, either by the | 
|  | CPU or by the compiler.  A simple example of this can be seen in | 
|  | `slow_dentry_cmp()` which, for filesystems which do not use simple | 
|  | byte-wise name equality, calls into the filesystem to compare a name | 
|  | against a dentry.  The length and name pointer are copied into local | 
|  | variables, then `read_seqcount_retry()` is called to confirm the two | 
|  | are consistent, and only then is `->d_compare()` called.  When | 
|  | standard filename comparison is used, `dentry_cmp()` is called | 
|  | instead.  Notably it does _not_ use `read_seqcount_retry()`, but | 
|  | instead has a large comment explaining why the consistency guarantee | 
|  | isn't necessary.  A subsequent `read_seqcount_retry()` will be | 
|  | sufficient to catch any problem that could occur at this point. | 
|  |  | 
|  | With that little refresher on seqlocks out of the way we can look at | 
|  | the bigger picture of how RCU-walk uses seqlocks. | 
|  |  | 
|  | ### `mount_lock` and `nd->m_seq` ### | 
|  |  | 
|  | We already met the `mount_lock` seqlock when REF-walk used it to | 
|  | ensure that crossing a mount point is performed safely.  RCU-walk uses | 
|  | it for that too, but for quite a bit more. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Instead of taking a counted reference to each `vfsmount` as it | 
|  | descends the tree, RCU-walk samples the state of `mount_lock` at the | 
|  | start of the walk and stores this initial sequence number in the | 
|  | `struct nameidata` in the `m_seq` field.  This one lock and one | 
|  | sequence number are used to validate all accesses to all `vfsmounts`, | 
|  | and all mount point crossings.  As changes to the mount table are | 
|  | relatively rare, it is reasonable to fall back on REF-walk any time | 
|  | that any "mount" or "unmount" happens. | 
|  |  | 
|  | `m_seq` is checked (using `read_seqretry()`) at the end of an RCU-walk | 
|  | sequence, whether switching to REF-walk for the rest of the path or | 
|  | when the end of the path is reached.  It is also checked when stepping | 
|  | down over a mount point (in `__follow_mount_rcu()`) or up (in | 
|  | `follow_dotdot_rcu()`).  If it is ever found to have changed, the | 
|  | whole RCU-walk sequence is aborted and the path is processed again by | 
|  | REF-walk. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If RCU-walk finds that `mount_lock` hasn't changed then it can be sure | 
|  | that, had REF-walk taken counted references on each vfsmount, the | 
|  | results would have been the same.  This ensures the invariant holds, | 
|  | at least for vfsmount structures. | 
|  |  | 
|  | ### `dentry->d_seq` and `nd->seq`. ### | 
|  |  | 
|  | In place of taking a count or lock on `d_reflock`, RCU-walk samples | 
|  | the per-dentry `d_seq` seqlock, and stores the sequence number in the | 
|  | `seq` field of the nameidata structure, so `nd->seq` should always be | 
|  | the current sequence number of `nd->dentry`.  This number needs to be | 
|  | revalidated after copying, and before using, the name, parent, or | 
|  | inode of the dentry. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The handling of the name we have already looked at, and the parent is | 
|  | only accessed in `follow_dotdot_rcu()` which fairly trivially follows | 
|  | the required pattern, though it does so for three different cases. | 
|  |  | 
|  | When not at a mount point, `d_parent` is followed and its `d_seq` is | 
|  | collected.  When we are at a mount point, we instead follow the | 
|  | `mnt->mnt_mountpoint` link to get a new dentry and collect its | 
|  | `d_seq`.  Then, after finally finding a `d_parent` to follow, we must | 
|  | check if we have landed on a mount point and, if so, must find that | 
|  | mount point and follow the `mnt->mnt_root` link.  This would imply a | 
|  | somewhat unusual, but certainly possible, circumstance where the | 
|  | starting point of the path lookup was in part of the filesystem that | 
|  | was mounted on, and so not visible from the root. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The inode pointer, stored in `->d_inode`, is a little more | 
|  | interesting.  The inode will always need to be accessed at least | 
|  | twice, once to determine if it is NULL and once to verify access | 
|  | permissions.  Symlink handling requires a validated inode pointer too. | 
|  | Rather than revalidating on each access, a copy is made on the first | 
|  | access and it is stored in the `inode` field of `nameidata` from where | 
|  | it can be safely accessed without further validation. | 
|  |  | 
|  | `lookup_fast()` is the only lookup routine that is used in RCU-mode, | 
|  | `lookup_slow()` being too slow and requiring locks.  It is in | 
|  | `lookup_fast()` that we find the important "hand over hand" tracking | 
|  | of the current dentry. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The current `dentry` and current `seq` number are passed to | 
|  | `__d_lookup_rcu()` which, on success, returns a new `dentry` and a | 
|  | new `seq` number.  `lookup_fast()` then copies the inode pointer and | 
|  | revalidates the new `seq` number.  It then validates the old `dentry` | 
|  | with the old `seq` number one last time and only then continues.  This | 
|  | process of getting the `seq` number of the new dentry and then | 
|  | checking the `seq` number of the old exactly mirrors the process of | 
|  | getting a counted reference to the new dentry before dropping that for | 
|  | the old dentry which we saw in REF-walk. | 
|  |  | 
|  | ### No `inode->i_mutex` or even `rename_lock` ### | 
|  |  | 
|  | A mutex is a fairly heavyweight lock that can only be taken when it is | 
|  | permissible to sleep.  As `rcu_read_lock()` forbids sleeping, | 
|  | `inode->i_mutex` plays no role in RCU-walk.  If some other thread does | 
|  | take `i_mutex` and modifies the directory in a way that RCU-walk needs | 
|  | to notice, the result will be either that RCU-walk fails to find the | 
|  | dentry that it is looking for, or it will find a dentry which | 
|  | `read_seqretry()` won't validate.  In either case it will drop down to | 
|  | REF-walk mode which can take whatever locks are needed. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Though `rename_lock` could be used by RCU-walk as it doesn't require | 
|  | any sleeping, RCU-walk doesn't bother.  REF-walk uses `rename_lock` to | 
|  | protect against the possibility of hash chains in the dcache changing | 
|  | while they are being searched.  This can result in failing to find | 
|  | something that actually is there.  When RCU-walk fails to find | 
|  | something in the dentry cache, whether it is really there or not, it | 
|  | already drops down to REF-walk and tries again with appropriate | 
|  | locking.  This neatly handles all cases, so adding extra checks on | 
|  | rename_lock would bring no significant value. | 
|  |  | 
|  | `unlazy walk()` and `complete_walk()` | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | That "dropping down to REF-walk" typically involves a call to | 
|  | `unlazy_walk()`, so named because "RCU-walk" is also sometimes | 
|  | referred to as "lazy walk".  `unlazy_walk()` is called when | 
|  | following the path down to the current vfsmount/dentry pair seems to | 
|  | have proceeded successfully, but the next step is problematic.  This | 
|  | can happen if the next name cannot be found in the dcache, if | 
|  | permission checking or name revalidation couldn't be achieved while | 
|  | the `rcu_read_lock()` is held (which forbids sleeping), if an | 
|  | automount point is found, or in a couple of cases involving symlinks. | 
|  | It is also called from `complete_walk()` when the lookup has reached | 
|  | the final component, or the very end of the path, depending on which | 
|  | particular flavor of lookup is used. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Other reasons for dropping out of RCU-walk that do not trigger a call | 
|  | to `unlazy_walk()` are when some inconsistency is found that cannot be | 
|  | handled immediately, such as `mount_lock` or one of the `d_seq` | 
|  | seqlocks reporting a change.  In these cases the relevant function | 
|  | will return `-ECHILD` which will percolate up until it triggers a new | 
|  | attempt from the top using REF-walk. | 
|  |  | 
|  | For those cases where `unlazy_walk()` is an option, it essentially | 
|  | takes a reference on each of the pointers that it holds (vfsmount, | 
|  | dentry, and possibly some symbolic links) and then verifies that the | 
|  | relevant seqlocks have not been changed.  If there have been changes, | 
|  | it, too, aborts with `-ECHILD`, otherwise the transition to REF-walk | 
|  | has been a success and the lookup process continues. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Taking a reference on those pointers is not quite as simple as just | 
|  | incrementing a counter.  That works to take a second reference if you | 
|  | already have one (often indirectly through another object), but it | 
|  | isn't sufficient if you don't actually have a counted reference at | 
|  | all.  For `dentry->d_lockref`, it is safe to increment the reference | 
|  | counter to get a reference unless it has been explicitly marked as | 
|  | "dead" which involves setting the counter to `-128`. | 
|  | `lockref_get_not_dead()` achieves this. | 
|  |  | 
|  | For `mnt->mnt_count` it is safe to take a reference as long as | 
|  | `mount_lock` is then used to validate the reference.  If that | 
|  | validation fails, it may *not* be safe to just drop that reference in | 
|  | the standard way of calling `mnt_put()` - an unmount may have | 
|  | progressed too far.  So the code in `legitimize_mnt()`, when it | 
|  | finds that the reference it got might not be safe, checks the | 
|  | `MNT_SYNC_UMOUNT` flag to determine if a simple `mnt_put()` is | 
|  | correct, or if it should just decrement the count and pretend none of | 
|  | this ever happened. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Taking care in filesystems | 
|  | --------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | RCU-walk depends almost entirely on cached information and often will | 
|  | not call into the filesystem at all.  However there are two places, | 
|  | besides the already-mentioned component-name comparison, where the | 
|  | file system might be included in RCU-walk, and it must know to be | 
|  | careful. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the filesystem has non-standard permission-checking requirements - | 
|  | such as a networked filesystem which may need to check with the server | 
|  | - the `i_op->permission` interface might be called during RCU-walk. | 
|  | In this case an extra "`MAY_NOT_BLOCK`" flag is passed so that it | 
|  | knows not to sleep, but to return `-ECHILD` if it cannot complete | 
|  | promptly.  `i_op->permission` is given the inode pointer, not the | 
|  | dentry, so it doesn't need to worry about further consistency checks. | 
|  | However if it accesses any other filesystem data structures, it must | 
|  | ensure they are safe to be accessed with only the `rcu_read_lock()` | 
|  | held.  This typically means they must be freed using `kfree_rcu()` or | 
|  | similar. | 
|  |  | 
|  | [`READ_ONCE()`]: https://lwn.net/Articles/624126/ | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the filesystem may need to revalidate dcache entries, then | 
|  | `d_op->d_revalidate` may be called in RCU-walk too.  This interface | 
|  | *is* passed the dentry but does not have access to the `inode` or the | 
|  | `seq` number from the `nameidata`, so it needs to be extra careful | 
|  | when accessing fields in the dentry.  This "extra care" typically | 
|  | involves using `ACCESS_ONCE()` or the newer [`READ_ONCE()`] to access | 
|  | fields, and verifying the result is not NULL before using it.  This | 
|  | pattern can be see in `nfs_lookup_revalidate()`. | 
|  |  | 
|  | A pair of patterns | 
|  | ------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | In various places in the details of REF-walk and RCU-walk, and also in | 
|  | the big picture, there are a couple of related patterns that are worth | 
|  | being aware of. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The first is "try quickly and check, if that fails try slowly".  We | 
|  | can see that in the high-level approach of first trying RCU-walk and | 
|  | then trying REF-walk, and in places where `unlazy_walk()` is used to | 
|  | switch to REF-walk for the rest of the path.  We also saw it earlier | 
|  | in `dget_parent()` when following a "`..`" link.  It tries a quick way | 
|  | to get a reference, then falls back to taking locks if needed. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The second pattern is "try quickly and check, if that fails try | 
|  | again - repeatedly".  This is seen with the use of `rename_lock` and | 
|  | `mount_lock` in REF-walk.  RCU-walk doesn't make use of this pattern - | 
|  | if anything goes wrong it is much safer to just abort and try a more | 
|  | sedate approach. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The emphasis here is "try quickly and check".  It should probably be | 
|  | "try quickly _and carefully,_ then check".  The fact that checking is | 
|  | needed is a reminder that the system is dynamic and only a limited | 
|  | number of things are safe at all.  The most likely cause of errors in | 
|  | this whole process is assuming something is safe when in reality it | 
|  | isn't.  Careful consideration of what exactly guarantees the safety of | 
|  | each access is sometimes necessary. | 
|  |  | 
|  | A walk among the symlinks | 
|  | ========================= | 
|  |  | 
|  | There are several basic issues that we will examine to understand the | 
|  | handling of symbolic links:  the symlink stack, together with cache | 
|  | lifetimes, will help us understand the overall recursive handling of | 
|  | symlinks and lead to the special care needed for the final component. | 
|  | Then a consideration of access-time updates and summary of the various | 
|  | flags controlling lookup will finish the story. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The symlink stack | 
|  | ----------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | There are only two sorts of filesystem objects that can usefully | 
|  | appear in a path prior to the final component: directories and symlinks. | 
|  | Handling directories is quite straightforward: the new directory | 
|  | simply becomes the starting point at which to interpret the next | 
|  | component on the path.  Handling symbolic links requires a bit more | 
|  | work. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Conceptually, symbolic links could be handled by editing the path.  If | 
|  | a component name refers to a symbolic link, then that component is | 
|  | replaced by the body of the link and, if that body starts with a '/', | 
|  | then all preceding parts of the path are discarded.  This is what the | 
|  | "`readlink -f`" command does, though it also edits out "`.`" and | 
|  | "`..`" components. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Directly editing the path string is not really necessary when looking | 
|  | up a path, and discarding early components is pointless as they aren't | 
|  | looked at anyway.  Keeping track of all remaining components is | 
|  | important, but they can of course be kept separately; there is no need | 
|  | to concatenate them.  As one symlink may easily refer to another, | 
|  | which in turn can refer to a third, we may need to keep the remaining | 
|  | components of several paths, each to be processed when the preceding | 
|  | ones are completed.  These path remnants are kept on a stack of | 
|  | limited size. | 
|  |  | 
|  | There are two reasons for placing limits on how many symlinks can | 
|  | occur in a single path lookup.  The most obvious is to avoid loops. | 
|  | If a symlink referred to itself either directly or through | 
|  | intermediaries, then following the symlink can never complete | 
|  | successfully - the error `ELOOP` must be returned.  Loops can be | 
|  | detected without imposing limits, but limits are the simplest solution | 
|  | and, given the second reason for restriction, quite sufficient. | 
|  |  | 
|  | [outlined recently]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1934390/focus=1934550 | 
|  |  | 
|  | The second reason was [outlined recently] by Linus: | 
|  |  | 
|  | >  Because it's a latency and DoS issue too. We need to react well to | 
|  | >  true loops, but also to "very deep" non-loops. It's not about memory | 
|  | >  use, it's about users triggering unreasonable CPU resources. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Linux imposes a limit on the length of any pathname: `PATH_MAX`, which | 
|  | is 4096.  There are a number of reasons for this limit; not letting the | 
|  | kernel spend too much time on just one path is one of them.  With | 
|  | symbolic links you can effectively generate much longer paths so some | 
|  | sort of limit is needed for the same reason.  Linux imposes a limit of | 
|  | at most 40 symlinks in any one path lookup.  It previously imposed a | 
|  | further limit of eight on the maximum depth of recursion, but that was | 
|  | raised to 40 when a separate stack was implemented, so there is now | 
|  | just the one limit. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The `nameidata` structure that we met in an earlier article contains a | 
|  | small stack that can be used to store the remaining part of up to two | 
|  | symlinks.  In many cases this will be sufficient.  If it isn't, a | 
|  | separate stack is allocated with room for 40 symlinks.  Pathname | 
|  | lookup will never exceed that stack as, once the 40th symlink is | 
|  | detected, an error is returned. | 
|  |  | 
|  | It might seem that the name remnants are all that needs to be stored on | 
|  | this stack, but we need a bit more.  To see that, we need to move on to | 
|  | cache lifetimes. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Storage and lifetime of cached symlinks | 
|  | --------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Like other filesystem resources, such as inodes and directory | 
|  | entries, symlinks are cached by Linux to avoid repeated costly access | 
|  | to external storage.  It is particularly important for RCU-walk to be | 
|  | able to find and temporarily hold onto these cached entries, so that | 
|  | it doesn't need to drop down into REF-walk. | 
|  |  | 
|  | [object-oriented design pattern]: https://lwn.net/Articles/446317/ | 
|  |  | 
|  | While each filesystem is free to make its own choice, symlinks are | 
|  | typically stored in one of two places.  Short symlinks are often | 
|  | stored directly in the inode.  When a filesystem allocates a `struct | 
|  | inode` it typically allocates extra space to store private data (a | 
|  | common [object-oriented design pattern] in the kernel).  This will | 
|  | sometimes include space for a symlink.  The other common location is | 
|  | in the page cache, which normally stores the content of files.  The | 
|  | pathname in a symlink can be seen as the content of that symlink and | 
|  | can easily be stored in the page cache just like file content. | 
|  |  | 
|  | When neither of these is suitable, the next most likely scenario is | 
|  | that the filesystem will allocate some temporary memory and copy or | 
|  | construct the symlink content into that memory whenever it is needed. | 
|  |  | 
|  | When the symlink is stored in the inode, it has the same lifetime as | 
|  | the inode which, itself, is protected by RCU or by a counted reference | 
|  | on the dentry.  This means that the mechanisms that pathname lookup | 
|  | uses to access the dcache and icache (inode cache) safely are quite | 
|  | sufficient for accessing some cached symlinks safely.  In these cases, | 
|  | the `i_link` pointer in the inode is set to point to wherever the | 
|  | symlink is stored and it can be accessed directly whenever needed. | 
|  |  | 
|  | When the symlink is stored in the page cache or elsewhere, the | 
|  | situation is not so straightforward.  A reference on a dentry or even | 
|  | on an inode does not imply any reference on cached pages of that | 
|  | inode, and even an `rcu_read_lock()` is not sufficient to ensure that | 
|  | a page will not disappear.  So for these symlinks the pathname lookup | 
|  | code needs to ask the filesystem to provide a stable reference and, | 
|  | significantly, needs to release that reference when it is finished | 
|  | with it. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Taking a reference to a cache page is often possible even in RCU-walk | 
|  | mode.  It does require making changes to memory, which is best avoided, | 
|  | but that isn't necessarily a big cost and it is better than dropping | 
|  | out of RCU-walk mode completely.  Even filesystems that allocate | 
|  | space to copy the symlink into can use `GFP_ATOMIC` to often successfully | 
|  | allocate memory without the need to drop out of RCU-walk.  If a | 
|  | filesystem cannot successfully get a reference in RCU-walk mode, it | 
|  | must return `-ECHILD` and `unlazy_walk()` will be called to return to | 
|  | REF-walk mode in which the filesystem is allowed to sleep. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The place for all this to happen is the `i_op->follow_link()` inode | 
|  | method.  In the present mainline code this is never actually called in | 
|  | RCU-walk mode as the rewrite is not quite complete.  It is likely that | 
|  | in a future release this method will be passed an `inode` pointer when | 
|  | called in RCU-walk mode so it both (1) knows to be careful, and (2) has the | 
|  | validated pointer.  Much like the `i_op->permission()` method we | 
|  | looked at previously, `->follow_link()` would need to be careful that | 
|  | all the data structures it references are safe to be accessed while | 
|  | holding no counted reference, only the RCU lock.  Though getting a | 
|  | reference with `->follow_link()` is not yet done in RCU-walk mode, the | 
|  | code is ready to release the reference when that does happen. | 
|  |  | 
|  | This need to drop the reference to a symlink adds significant | 
|  | complexity.  It requires a reference to the inode so that the | 
|  | `i_op->put_link()` inode operation can be called.  In REF-walk, that | 
|  | reference is kept implicitly through a reference to the dentry, so | 
|  | keeping the `struct path` of the symlink is easiest.  For RCU-walk, | 
|  | the pointer to the inode is kept separately.  To allow switching from | 
|  | RCU-walk back to REF-walk in the middle of processing nested symlinks | 
|  | we also need the seq number for the dentry so we can confirm that | 
|  | switching back was safe. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Finally, when providing a reference to a symlink, the filesystem also | 
|  | provides an opaque "cookie" that must be passed to `->put_link()` so that it | 
|  | knows what to free.  This might be the allocated memory area, or a | 
|  | pointer to the `struct page` in the page cache, or something else | 
|  | completely.  Only the filesystem knows what it is. | 
|  |  | 
|  | In order for the reference to each symlink to be dropped when the walk completes, | 
|  | whether in RCU-walk or REF-walk, the symlink stack needs to contain, | 
|  | along with the path remnants: | 
|  |  | 
|  | - the `struct path` to provide a reference to the inode in REF-walk | 
|  | - the `struct inode *` to provide a reference to the inode in RCU-walk | 
|  | - the `seq` to allow the path to be safely switched from RCU-walk to REF-walk | 
|  | - the `cookie` that tells `->put_path()` what to put. | 
|  |  | 
|  | This means that each entry in the symlink stack needs to hold five | 
|  | pointers and an integer instead of just one pointer (the path | 
|  | remnant).  On a 64-bit system, this is about 40 bytes per entry; | 
|  | with 40 entries it adds up to 1600 bytes total, which is less than | 
|  | half a page.  So it might seem like a lot, but is by no means | 
|  | excessive. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Note that, in a given stack frame, the path remnant (`name`) is not | 
|  | part of the symlink that the other fields refer to.  It is the remnant | 
|  | to be followed once that symlink has been fully parsed. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Following the symlink | 
|  | --------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | The main loop in `link_path_walk()` iterates seamlessly over all | 
|  | components in the path and all of the non-final symlinks.  As symlinks | 
|  | are processed, the `name` pointer is adjusted to point to a new | 
|  | symlink, or is restored from the stack, so that much of the loop | 
|  | doesn't need to notice.  Getting this `name` variable on and off the | 
|  | stack is very straightforward; pushing and popping the references is | 
|  | a little more complex. | 
|  |  | 
|  | When a symlink is found, `walk_component()` returns the value `1` | 
|  | (`0` is returned for any other sort of success, and a negative number | 
|  | is, as usual, an error indicator).  This causes `get_link()` to be | 
|  | called; it then gets the link from the filesystem.  Providing that | 
|  | operation is successful, the old path `name` is placed on the stack, | 
|  | and the new value is used as the `name` for a while.  When the end of | 
|  | the path is found (i.e. `*name` is `'\0'`) the old `name` is restored | 
|  | off the stack and path walking continues. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Pushing and popping the reference pointers (inode, cookie, etc.) is more | 
|  | complex in part because of the desire to handle tail recursion.  When | 
|  | the last component of a symlink itself points to a symlink, we | 
|  | want to pop the symlink-just-completed off the stack before pushing | 
|  | the symlink-just-found to avoid leaving empty path remnants that would | 
|  | just get in the way. | 
|  |  | 
|  | It is most convenient to push the new symlink references onto the | 
|  | stack in `walk_component()` immediately when the symlink is found; | 
|  | `walk_component()` is also the last piece of code that needs to look at the | 
|  | old symlink as it walks that last component.  So it is quite | 
|  | convenient for `walk_component()` to release the old symlink and pop | 
|  | the references just before pushing the reference information for the | 
|  | new symlink.  It is guided in this by two flags; `WALK_GET`, which | 
|  | gives it permission to follow a symlink if it finds one, and | 
|  | `WALK_PUT`, which tells it to release the current symlink after it has been | 
|  | followed.  `WALK_PUT` is tested first, leading to a call to | 
|  | `put_link()`.  `WALK_GET` is tested subsequently (by | 
|  | `should_follow_link()`) leading to a call to `pick_link()` which sets | 
|  | up the stack frame. | 
|  |  | 
|  | ### Symlinks with no final component ### | 
|  |  | 
|  | A pair of special-case symlinks deserve a little further explanation. | 
|  | Both result in a new `struct path` (with mount and dentry) being set | 
|  | up in the `nameidata`, and result in `get_link()` returning `NULL`. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The more obvious case is a symlink to "`/`".  All symlinks starting | 
|  | with "`/`" are detected in `get_link()` which resets the `nameidata` | 
|  | to point to the effective filesystem root.  If the symlink only | 
|  | contains "`/`" then there is nothing more to do, no components at all, | 
|  | so `NULL` is returned to indicate that the symlink can be released and | 
|  | the stack frame discarded. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The other case involves things in `/proc` that look like symlinks but | 
|  | aren't really. | 
|  |  | 
|  | >     $ ls -l /proc/self/fd/1 | 
|  | >     lrwx------ 1 neilb neilb 64 Jun 13 10:19 /proc/self/fd/1 -> /dev/pts/4 | 
|  |  | 
|  | Every open file descriptor in any process is represented in `/proc` by | 
|  | something that looks like a symlink.  It is really a reference to the | 
|  | target file, not just the name of it.  When you `readlink` these | 
|  | objects you get a name that might refer to the same file - unless it | 
|  | has been unlinked or mounted over.  When `walk_component()` follows | 
|  | one of these, the `->follow_link()` method in "procfs" doesn't return | 
|  | a string name, but instead calls `nd_jump_link()` which updates the | 
|  | `nameidata` in place to point to that target.  `->follow_link()` then | 
|  | returns `NULL`.  Again there is no final component and `get_link()` | 
|  | reports this by leaving the `last_type` field of `nameidata` as | 
|  | `LAST_BIND`. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Following the symlink in the final component | 
|  | -------------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | All this leads to `link_path_walk()` walking down every component, and | 
|  | following all symbolic links it finds, until it reaches the final | 
|  | component.  This is just returned in the `last` field of `nameidata`. | 
|  | For some callers, this is all they need; they want to create that | 
|  | `last` name if it doesn't exist or give an error if it does.  Other | 
|  | callers will want to follow a symlink if one is found, and possibly | 
|  | apply special handling to the last component of that symlink, rather | 
|  | than just the last component of the original file name.  These callers | 
|  | potentially need to call `link_path_walk()` again and again on | 
|  | successive symlinks until one is found that doesn't point to another | 
|  | symlink. | 
|  |  | 
|  | This case is handled by the relevant caller of `link_path_walk()`, such as | 
|  | `path_lookupat()` using a loop that calls `link_path_walk()`, and then | 
|  | handles the final component.  If the final component is a symlink | 
|  | that needs to be followed, then `trailing_symlink()` is called to set | 
|  | things up properly and the loop repeats, calling `link_path_walk()` | 
|  | again.  This could loop as many as 40 times if the last component of | 
|  | each symlink is another symlink. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The various functions that examine the final component and possibly | 
|  | report that it is a symlink are `lookup_last()`, `mountpoint_last()` | 
|  | and `do_last()`, each of which use the same convention as | 
|  | `walk_component()` of returning `1` if a symlink was found that needs | 
|  | to be followed. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Of these, `do_last()` is the most interesting as it is used for | 
|  | opening a file.  Part of `do_last()` runs with `i_mutex` held and this | 
|  | part is in a separate function: `lookup_open()`. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Explaining `do_last()` completely is beyond the scope of this article, | 
|  | but a few highlights should help those interested in exploring the | 
|  | code. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 1. Rather than just finding the target file, `do_last()` needs to open | 
|  | it.  If the file was found in the dcache, then `vfs_open()` is used for | 
|  | this.  If not, then `lookup_open()` will either call `atomic_open()` (if | 
|  | the filesystem provides it) to combine the final lookup with the open, or | 
|  | will perform the separate `lookup_real()` and `vfs_create()` steps | 
|  | directly.  In the later case the actual "open" of this newly found or | 
|  | created file will be performed by `vfs_open()`, just as if the name | 
|  | were found in the dcache. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 2. `vfs_open()` can fail with `-EOPENSTALE` if the cached information | 
|  | wasn't quite current enough.  Rather than restarting the lookup from | 
|  | the top with `LOOKUP_REVAL` set, `lookup_open()` is called instead, | 
|  | giving the filesystem a chance to resolve small inconsistencies. | 
|  | If that doesn't work, only then is the lookup restarted from the top. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 3. An open with O_CREAT **does** follow a symlink in the final component, | 
|  | unlike other creation system calls (like `mkdir`).  So the sequence: | 
|  |  | 
|  | >     ln -s bar /tmp/foo | 
|  | >     echo hello > /tmp/foo | 
|  |  | 
|  | will create a file called `/tmp/bar`.  This is not permitted if | 
|  | `O_EXCL` is set but otherwise is handled for an O_CREAT open much | 
|  | like for a non-creating open: `should_follow_link()` returns `1`, and | 
|  | so does `do_last()` so that `trailing_symlink()` gets called and the | 
|  | open process continues on the symlink that was found. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Updating the access time | 
|  | ------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | We previously said of RCU-walk that it would "take no locks, increment | 
|  | no counts, leave no footprints."  We have since seen that some | 
|  | "footprints" can be needed when handling symlinks as a counted | 
|  | reference (or even a memory allocation) may be needed.  But these | 
|  | footprints are best kept to a minimum. | 
|  |  | 
|  | One other place where walking down a symlink can involve leaving | 
|  | footprints in a way that doesn't affect directories is in updating access times. | 
|  | In Unix (and Linux) every filesystem object has a "last accessed | 
|  | time", or "`atime`".  Passing through a directory to access a file | 
|  | within is not considered to be an access for the purposes of | 
|  | `atime`; only listing the contents of a directory can update its `atime`. | 
|  | Symlinks are different it seems.  Both reading a symlink (with `readlink()`) | 
|  | and looking up a symlink on the way to some other destination can | 
|  | update the atime on that symlink. | 
|  |  | 
|  | [clearest statement]: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap04.html#tag_04_08 | 
|  |  | 
|  | It is not clear why this is the case; POSIX has little to say on the | 
|  | subject.  The [clearest statement] is that, if a particular implementation | 
|  | updates a timestamp in a place not specified by POSIX, this must be | 
|  | documented "except that any changes caused by pathname resolution need | 
|  | not be documented".  This seems to imply that POSIX doesn't really | 
|  | care about access-time updates during pathname lookup. | 
|  |  | 
|  | [Linux 1.3.87]: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/history/history.git/diff/fs/ext2/symlink.c?id=f806c6db77b8eaa6e00dcfb6b567706feae8dbb8 | 
|  |  | 
|  | An examination of history shows that prior to [Linux 1.3.87], the ext2 | 
|  | filesystem, at least, didn't update atime when following a link. | 
|  | Unfortunately we have no record of why that behavior was changed. | 
|  |  | 
|  | In any case, access time must now be updated and that operation can be | 
|  | quite complex.  Trying to stay in RCU-walk while doing it is best | 
|  | avoided.  Fortunately it is often permitted to skip the `atime` | 
|  | update.  Because `atime` updates cause performance problems in various | 
|  | areas, Linux supports the `relatime` mount option, which generally | 
|  | limits the updates of `atime` to once per day on files that aren't | 
|  | being changed (and symlinks never change once created).  Even without | 
|  | `relatime`, many filesystems record `atime` with a one-second | 
|  | granularity, so only one update per second is required. | 
|  |  | 
|  | It is easy to test if an `atime` update is needed while in RCU-walk | 
|  | mode and, if it isn't, the update can be skipped and RCU-walk mode | 
|  | continues.  Only when an `atime` update is actually required does the | 
|  | path walk drop down to REF-walk.  All of this is handled in the | 
|  | `get_link()` function. | 
|  |  | 
|  | A few flags | 
|  | ----------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | A suitable way to wrap up this tour of pathname walking is to list | 
|  | the various flags that can be stored in the `nameidata` to guide the | 
|  | lookup process.  Many of these are only meaningful on the final | 
|  | component, others reflect the current state of the pathname lookup. | 
|  | And then there is `LOOKUP_EMPTY`, which doesn't fit conceptually with | 
|  | the others.  If this is not set, an empty pathname causes an error | 
|  | very early on.  If it is set, empty pathnames are not considered to be | 
|  | an error. | 
|  |  | 
|  | ### Global state flags ### | 
|  |  | 
|  | We have already met two global state flags: `LOOKUP_RCU` and | 
|  | `LOOKUP_REVAL`.  These select between one of three overall approaches | 
|  | to lookup: RCU-walk, REF-walk, and REF-walk with forced revalidation. | 
|  |  | 
|  | `LOOKUP_PARENT` indicates that the final component hasn't been reached | 
|  | yet.  This is primarily used to tell the audit subsystem the full | 
|  | context of a particular access being audited. | 
|  |  | 
|  | `LOOKUP_ROOT` indicates that the `root` field in the `nameidata` was | 
|  | provided by the caller, so it shouldn't be released when it is no | 
|  | longer needed. | 
|  |  | 
|  | `LOOKUP_JUMPED` means that the current dentry was chosen not because | 
|  | it had the right name but for some other reason.  This happens when | 
|  | following "`..`", following a symlink to `/`, crossing a mount point | 
|  | or accessing a "`/proc/$PID/fd/$FD`" symlink.  In this case the | 
|  | filesystem has not been asked to revalidate the name (with | 
|  | `d_revalidate()`).  In such cases the inode may still need to be | 
|  | revalidated, so `d_op->d_weak_revalidate()` is called if | 
|  | `LOOKUP_JUMPED` is set when the look completes - which may be at the | 
|  | final component or, when creating, unlinking, or renaming, at the penultimate component. | 
|  |  | 
|  | ### Final-component flags ### | 
|  |  | 
|  | Some of these flags are only set when the final component is being | 
|  | considered.  Others are only checked for when considering that final | 
|  | component. | 
|  |  | 
|  | `LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT` ensures that, if the final component is an automount | 
|  | point, then the mount is triggered.  Some operations would trigger it | 
|  | anyway, but operations like `stat()` deliberately don't.  `statfs()` | 
|  | needs to trigger the mount but otherwise behaves a lot like `stat()`, so | 
|  | it sets `LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT`, as does "`quotactl()`" and the handling of | 
|  | "`mount --bind`". | 
|  |  | 
|  | `LOOKUP_FOLLOW` has a similar function to `LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT` but for | 
|  | symlinks.  Some system calls set or clear it implicitly, while | 
|  | others have API flags such as `AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW` and | 
|  | `UMOUNT_NOFOLLOW` to control it.  Its effect is similar to | 
|  | `WALK_GET` that we already met, but it is used in a different way. | 
|  |  | 
|  | `LOOKUP_DIRECTORY` insists that the final component is a directory. | 
|  | Various callers set this and it is also set when the final component | 
|  | is found to be followed by a slash. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Finally `LOOKUP_OPEN`, `LOOKUP_CREATE`, `LOOKUP_EXCL`, and | 
|  | `LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET` are not used directly by the VFS but are made | 
|  | available to the filesystem and particularly the `->d_revalidate()` | 
|  | method.  A filesystem can choose not to bother revalidating too hard | 
|  | if it knows that it will be asked to open or create the file soon. | 
|  | These flags were previously useful for `->lookup()` too but with the | 
|  | introduction of `->atomic_open()` they are less relevant there. | 
|  |  | 
|  | End of the road | 
|  | --------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Despite its complexity, all this pathname lookup code appears to be | 
|  | in good shape - various parts are certainly easier to understand now | 
|  | than even a couple of releases ago.  But that doesn't mean it is | 
|  | "finished".   As already mentioned, RCU-walk currently only follows | 
|  | symlinks that are stored in the inode so, while it handles many ext4 | 
|  | symlinks, it doesn't help with NFS, XFS, or Btrfs.  That support | 
|  | is not likely to be long delayed. |