NFC: port100: Fix possible buffer overflow

The arrays for protocols and rf techs must define a number of entries
corresponding to their maximum possible index values.

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/port100.c b/drivers/nfc/port100.c
index a8555f8..24f5e02 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/port100.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/port100.c
@@ -139,6 +139,8 @@
 		.in_recv_set_number = 15,
 		.in_recv_comm_type  = PORT100_COMM_TYPE_IN_106A,
 	},
+	/* Ensures the array has NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_LAST elements */
+	[NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_LAST] = { 0 },
 };
 
 /**
@@ -174,6 +176,9 @@
 		.tg_set_number = 8,
 		.tg_comm_type = PORT100_COMM_TYPE_TG_424F,
 	},
+	/* Ensures the array has NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_LAST elements */
+	[NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_LAST] = { 0 },
+
 };
 
 #define PORT100_IN_PROT_INITIAL_GUARD_TIME      0x00
@@ -330,6 +335,10 @@
 	[NFC_DIGITAL_FRAMING_NFC_DEP_ACTIVATED] = {
 		{ PORT100_IN_PROT_END, 0 },
 	},
+	/* Ensures the array has NFC_DIGITAL_FRAMING_LAST elements */
+	[NFC_DIGITAL_FRAMING_LAST] = {
+		{ PORT100_IN_PROT_END, 0 },
+	},
 };
 
 static struct port100_protocol
@@ -371,6 +380,10 @@
 		{ PORT100_TG_PROT_RF_OFF, 1 },
 		{ PORT100_TG_PROT_END,    0 },
 	},
+	/* Ensures the array has NFC_DIGITAL_FRAMING_LAST elements */
+	[NFC_DIGITAL_FRAMING_LAST] = {
+		{ PORT100_TG_PROT_END,    0 },
+	},
 };
 
 struct port100 {